南京朗阁GMAT作文机经

今天小编为大家带来的是2015-12-23GMAT作文机经的内容，就让GMAT写作真题助你一臂之力!

　　1. 吸引毕业生发展biotechnology

　　>>> 本月原始

　　V1.： Z城市的MARTINTON镇关了实验室，要提供资金把大学生吸引过来的那篇。

　　V2. 作文是关于biotechnology，讲的是现在开这个biotechnology公司 能对经济有好处，这种企业对实验器械和研究人员的要求其高，martinton 开了一个公司，里面都是大学生在做，但是后来被关闭了，since has closed ever since 这句话我没看太懂，Zaneviles 看上了这个计划，像实行，问你啥想法。 99%原题，各位练练手

　　>>> 考古

　　V1.： recommendation：zaneville city council to provide financial support to martinton university graduates， attract them to open bio-company in the town。

　　support: 1) biotechnology需要新技术新研发，能够给当地带来经济效益;2) martinton univ graduates started a successful company in laboratories, BUT CLOSED afterwards.

　　V2. 一个创业家做演讲游说 Z 市市政府,说 biotechnology company 对城市的经济有很大帮助,但是biotechnology company 需要很好的 lab 的条件。隔壁的 M 市就资助了很好的 lab,吸引某某大学的 graduate 留下创业。曾经有一个 biotech company 创立的非常成功。但是后来 M 市取消了这个资助。这个创业家认为这是好机会 Z 市赶紧资助 lab, 来吸引 graduate 来创业。

　　V3. 这个是生化创业者给v地区政府的一个presentation. 一直以来bio-tech 的研究都有助于innovation 并可以促进经济发展。martinton 的大学城就建立了这样的lab. 不过一般来说lab需要耗费许多资金，并且需要高端人才。martinton 大学城在v的确的附近。 近martintin的lab关了。这些创业家认为这个是v的好机会并且指出martinton关这个实验室是鼠目寸光。他们指出如果v政府投资扶持生化实验室，可以推动当地经济。并且吸引martinton大学城的学生来工作。

　　V4. : biotechnology is very important to enhance the economy, innovation should be encouraged. so the town paid for laboratories started by local university graduates， but later on the lab was shut. And the statement reckoned this shortsighted. 狗狗里的一篇。

　　V5. 作文考到了 biotechnology company 那篇，z 地要开公司，要 m 的毕业生来开。因为 m 之 前开过 lab 还成功了，虽然 后失败

　　>>> 参考思路

　　V1：狗主找的理由有：1) zaneville 不一定适合发展biotechnology， 可能地理环境，经济发展侧重不一样 blabla; 2) 投资biotechnology不一定带来经济效益， capital input in construction, R&D, operation maintenance有可能赔钱;3) martinton univ grads 开的公司 后关了除了经济因素还有其他原因，比如无法商业化，application不好，mass production不好，management, business strategy不成熟等等

　　1.无关类比:别的城市成功不=本市会成功

　　2.以偏概全:一个 biotech company 成功不代表大部分 company 会成功

　　3.信息不足:没有给出 evidence 为什么 M 市取消了这个资助

　　2. 健身器材和杂志 上月JJ 36

　　V1： 作文：因为the owner of Skyview Newsstand 说bodybuilders use the-state-of-art exercise machines而且这种先进的健身器材都卖光了，所有to maximize fitness levels of

　　residents，our community应该在健身中心增加这种健身器材

　　>>> 考古原题

　　The following appeared in the letters-to-the-editor section of a local newspaper.

　　“Muscle Monthly, a fitness magazine that regularly features pictures of bodybuilders using state-of-the-art exercise machines, frequently sells out, according to the owner of Skyview Newsstand. To help maximize fitness levels in our town’s residents, we should, therefore, equip our new community fitness center with such machines.”

　　>>> 参考思路

　　1. 无根据假设：

　　① 买杂志的人是因为这个报道上有such machine才买的

　　(杂志卖得好得原因不一定是因为刊登这个机器，很可能是价钱便宜，或其他的内容吸引读者。)

　　②喜欢such machine的人一定会用这个machine。

　　2.信息不足： 购买者未知，可能是这个machine的厂家自己买的

　　>>> 参考范文

　　In this argument the author concludes that the new community fitness center should be equipped with the state-of-the-art exercise machines featured in Muscle Monthly magazine. In support of this recommendation two reasons are offered: (1) Muscle Monthly contains pictures of bodybuilders using such machines, and (2) Muscle Monthly is a popular magazine, as evidenced by the fact that it frequently sells out at the local newsstand. This argument is questionable on two counts.

　　First, a major implication of the argument is that the bodybuilders pictured using the machines in Muscle Monthly magazine reached their state of fitness as a result of using these machines. The only evidence offered to support this contention, however, is the pictures in the magazine. It is possible that the bodybuilders pictured use different equipment for their workouts and are merely posing with the machines for advertising purposes.

　　Second, the author assumes that machines that are suitable for bodybuilding will also be suitable to help maximize the fitness levels of the town’s residents. This assumption is highly questionable. Machines designed to increase muscle development are significantly different from those designed to increase cardiovascular fitness. Consequently, it is unlikely that the machines pictured in the magazine will be of much use to help maximize the fitness levels of the town’s residents.

　　In conclusion, this argument is unconvincing. To strengthen the argument the author would have to show that the bodybuilders pictured using the exercise machines actually used the machines to reach their level of muscle development. Additionally, the author would have to show that the machines were suitable for increasing the fitness levels of the persons using them.